Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Worlds Apart

The reviews are rolling in for the new U2 record and, predictably, many of them begin by whinging about how insufferable and pompous Bono is. Since it's been awhile since the last U2 album, I'd forgotten about this. But here it is. Again. Over and over. The reviews have been fairly positive but the negative reviews have one glaring similarity -- they are dismissive. They're dismissive in part because the reviewer had that one listen, back when the band invited them to hear the record. One listen.

This is a problem, especially for a record like this. I've listened to it about five times now and it's starting to crystallize, but I'm still not ready to pass judgment on it. The way our world works now doesn't allow for that level of absorption. We take something in and then (usually while it's still playing/showing/we're still reading it) we make our judgment. Regardless of my final judgment (which is inching towards the positive with every listen), I applaud U2's determination to make a record that isn't high concept or easily digested. That's not an easy thing to do in Twitterific microblog-land.

Dollhouse has now aired twice, and fewer people watched the second episode than watched the first, if that's even possible without going into negative numbers. It's disturbing enough that people didn't tune in for the pilot, but that second episode erosion is just a fact of life. I know I've been guilty of it in the past, but I'm trying to give shows more of a chance. I'm glad I checked into the second episode of Dollhouse. I'm being a little disingenuous there, though... it's not like I wouldn't watch anything Joss Whedon gets on the air. But that's because I watched all of Firefly, which started out similarly rocky and got fucking great.

The second episode of Dollhouse was fantastic. The first episode felt like a show that had been cooked for too long. It was unfocused and lacked a throughline but as with all Joss Whedon shows, it had that uniqueness that makes it interesting. The second episode was focused, and the development of the relationship between Echo and Boyd was lovely and emotional, which really helped to clarify and coalesce the show.

What I really, really wish is that Whedon had gotten to shoot and air his original pilot because THAT thing felt like a pilot. Not totally formed, but I thought it was a much better launch than the aired pilot. Topher was much more interesting and less annoying, an intriguingly aware character. The introduction of Echo and explanation of the Actives worked better. And Paul, the resident Fed... he really suffered when they tossed the pilot out. I just thought it was a better representation of Whedon's world than the pilot we saw. It's too bad.

The way TeeVee works now and has worked for an unfortunate number of years is, you'd better hit it out of the fucking box with the pilot or your show's dead. Shows don't get the chance to grow on networks anymore. They won't pick up a full season of a new show and you aren't guaranteed that they'll air, much less shoot, your initial order. So there's far too much pressure on a pilot than there should be. More pressure means more fingers in the pie. More fingers in the pie means myriad points of view. And this means that the original voice -- the creator's -- is subsumed, sometimes to a destructive degree.

This is a necessity of network television, because the goal is to reach as large an audience as possible. Anyone who sells a show to a network gets this, even if it's a sometimes painful process.

Joss Whedon is an interesting case because he had a high-concept show right out of the gate. Buffy was an easy premise to understand, and the pilot totally works as the first episode of the show. You get why we're starting here. It sets the show and the characters up beautifully. The premise is so simple that it's easy to complicate. Joss added many layers to the show and the premise stayed rock solid. Angel was successful partly because it was a spinoff of the Buffyverse. I think we all know this, right? So what happened with Firefly? And Dollhouse?

Think about this for a minute -- Buffy didn't come out of nowhere. There was the movie. And Joss learned what didn't work from the movie. By the time he did the show, he'd lived with the character and the universe and, most crucially, the tone. And he made it work the second time around.

One of the things I appreciate most about Joss is his penchant for exploration, which is where Firefly and Dollhouse live. What we saw with Firefly and are seeing with Dollhouse, I think, is his process. Back in the day, about twenty or thirty years ago, a writer could explore like this because shows were put on the air, and there they stayed. But you can't do that now, not unless you're on cable. You certainly can't do it on network, unless your show was a hit right away (Lost). Although Joss earned a lot of capital with Buffy and Angel, he still gets smacked upside the head for an unclear premise or a half-formed pilot. So he'll get shows on, but then he'll live in hell until either he can figure it out, or the network cancels the show.

Joss is a world-builder. He built Buffy as a world, and spun off Angel into a parallel world that was still within the same universe. Firefly definitely had its own world, and Dollhouse does, too. But world-building usually doesn't spring fully formed. It needs to be nurtured. It needs to grow. It needs (like the formation of a real world) to make mistakes, to try things out. But in TeeVee, you can't do that, which is (I think) why it's so easy to pitch a procedural. You don't have to explain the world, because the world of a procedural has been so well defined. I don't think it's particularly interesting, but it is comforting and familiar to an audience, and the executives know that.

Joss doesn't work that way. His worlds are messy and complicated but if you stick around, they are fascinating. This type of exploration is a huge part of what I love most about TeeVee. And if I were Joss Whedon or JJ Abrams, then I could world-build. But not yet, gentle readers.

So people are dumping on Dollhouse. That's fine if you don't like Joss's process, or you prefer more clarity in your shows or premises. But if you're one of the people who is upset with the TeeVee status quo, then shame on you. And shame on me, too, for not always supporting these types of shows. But I'm going to make more of an effort to do so in the future. Hey, Fringe got good when y'all weren't looking, too!

I really do appreciate when people go for it, when they don't go for the cynical, obvious, easy answer. Being too cool, or too literal, or too predictable. I always hope that writers pitch what they truly love, but I don't always feel that they do. I miss big, elegiac shows, too. I don't think we've had one since the West Wing. I know it's fashionable to hate that show, but it did so many things wonderfully well. It was smart, for one. It was unabashed in its point of view; it didn't try to please everyone. And damn, Sorkin WENT for it on that show. Witness this sequence, from the second-season ender, Two Cathedrals. The only shows in recent memory that have used music this effectively are Sarah Connor (down, Deepstructure!) and Mad Men.

Being cynical is a safe default in TeeVee. If you're cynical, then you're doing something cool. You can deride shows that wear their hearts on their sleeves. Let's face it. Everyone wants to be cool. But being honest and open-hearted and not being afraid to show you love your characters, well... that's the truly brave thing to do.

I wanted to mention the Christian Bale thing, too, since I forgot to do so last time. People, step off. If you really think Christian Bale was wrong for what he said to the DP, I'm pretty sure you've never spent time on a set. This wasn't the first time the DP had gotten in Bale's eyeline. Bale's rant, for what it's worth, was pretty even-handed. And the only thing that made it notable, to me, was the fact that the director just fucking stood there and let it happen. Um, McG? It's your SET, dude. Why do you let this go on for four minutes? The second Bale starts on the DP, your job is to TAKE FUCKING CONTROL. Get the DP out of there, assure Bale it won't happen again. You don't stand there like an impotent jackass. You just don't. Grow a fucking spine.

Christian Bale is not a monster. He's a professional. And if the DP had been a professional, too, this wouldn't have happened. I think it's appalling that Bale was forced to apologize to the entire planet because somebody broke the rules and leaked this to the press. I'll bet that asshole didn't have to apologize to anyone. At least Bale wasn't forced to go to anger counseling.

np - Mando Diao, "Give Me Fire"

14 comments:

Gareth Wilson said...

I haven't seen Dollhouse, but it's interesting that both the Buffy pilot and the original Firefly pilot were two hours long, whereas Dollhouse was only an hour. Maybe if you're creating a whole new world you need a two-part pilot. I wonder how this applies to spec pilots. A double-sized spec might be frowned upon, but maybe it would be a better simulation of actually creating a series.

David Bishop said...

Watched the Dollhouse pilot and was massively underwhelmed. Plus I kept having flashbacks to Joe 90 repeats to the old Gerry Anderson show, where a 9-year-old gets imprinted with memories and abilities so he can go on secret missions.

But episode 2 was sooooo much better. Made me care about the characters. Feels like we're already hip-deep in mythology, and some of the puns are a bit laboured. [A deadly killer called Alpha who's male - Alpha Male - get it? Get it?]

But much, much better. I was ready to pull the plug after the pilot. Now I'll be watching for a while. Assuming Dollhouse has a while. This is Fox, after all.

Hugh Hancock said...

It's hip to hate the West Wing? Oh, dear. I'm rather glad I'm not a hip, cool grooving dude, in that case.

Also, I have better trousers this way.

God, I'm getting tired of people lining up to hate the popular thing. It seems to be more of a motif this decade than last.

And if I hear one more person come out with some variant on "Joss Whedon isn't a feminist, he just fancies strong women", I'm going to hit something.

deepstructure said...

"(down, Deepstructure!)"

haha, am i the only one that didn't like that episode? :)

i haven't seen the mad men episode but im completely agree with you on 'two cathedrals'.

so why are tv programs given more slack than films? films not only have to give you their entire world in 1.5-2hrs, but also have to do it in one episode. why can't tv pilots accomplish the same thing? (fully acknowledging that many films don't accomplish it either).

interesting that dollhouse got better. i'm with mr. bishop in that i was massively underwhelmed with the pilot.

A View From My Couch said...

Well my blog is a graveyard, like Friday night TV, so I'm back here to annoy. Please oh wise TV woman, please write a blog talking about how mid season replacements go down (ie; what execs have to consider, processes, stuff like that). Gracias.

Lee Goldberg said...

I thought episode two was even worse than episode one...a muddled mess built around yet another retelling of "The Most Dangerous Game." Yawn. No offense intended, but I didn't find any of the emotion in the episode that you did. In fact, I thought it was down-right emotionless. And what you found fascinating I found plodding (it felt like clips from the scrapped pilot stapled onto a cliche, by-the-numbers story). The show lacks the humor, charm, emotion, inventiveness and fun of BUFFY, ANGEL, and even FIREFLY ( a show I never liked much). LA FEMME NIKITA and even MY OWN WORST ENEMY mined the same territory and did it much better than DOLLHOUSE. And after two episodes, is still trying to established its needlessly complicated and uninvolving premise. This has nothing to do with settling for status quo TV. The show just isn't very good.

Devon Ellington said...

I missed the DOLLHOUSE pilot and watched part of the second episode. I kept getting ahead of it instead of being surprised by it, which disappointed me, and I'm not thrilled with some of the casting.

At this point, it's hard to do the whole "hunter and hunted" thing in a new way.

I do like some of the detail work, which means one has to pay attention.

I'm willing to keep watching a few more episodes. One of the things I've always admired about Whedon is his ability to mix off-beat humor in with the tougher stuff, sort of "ha, ha, OW!" when he really gets you. And that was completely lacking in DOLLHOUSE so far, at least in the scenes I watched.

I guess you could say I'm "guardedly curious."

I was a huge WEST WING fan and still watch it whenever it comes on. I love the writing and how, as you say, Sorkin went for it. i love characters who actually have something to say instead of hearing the same tired lines over and over again, "false wit".

Alan Smithee said...

Fringe got good? When was that?

I was with you up until then. Totally agree about taking time to absorb something and reserve judgment. That's what I've been trying to do with Fringe, despite wanting to give it up after that one about the mystery cylinders chased by a man with no motive but had a mind-reading machine AND a super gun from the future. But apparently people lapped that stuff up.

Fringe seems to operate with the same pile on tactics as Lost -- throw on the Super Cool Ideas and don't worry about resolution or motivation because half the audience will just assume you're doing something really clever called "foreshadowing" that they heard somewhere without properly understanding. They end with a big cliffhanger of Olivia being kidnapped, then next episode she's out of there without rhyme or reason IN THE FRAKKING TEASER! Does that not cry foul to any writer, let alone those on staff?

I'd like to reserve judgment and keep absorbing, but I think I've seen enough. I wanted to like it, truly I did, but it seems to be more Emperor's New Cloak TV.

Fair play to them getting their numbers though, and the production values give it that obligatory lure of gloss, but it's gotta be frustrating for anyone who's read the pilot script -- if that had A.N. Other spec writer's name on it instead of J.J. Abrams, no one would have made it to the end, let alone bought it.

Not that that's a surprise or a revelation, of course.

Horace LaBadie said...

Whedon shot a proposal for Buffy before he shot the pilot, and then he had an entire year after the first 13 episodes had been shot to go back and tinker with them. The first episode had some material added in that was shot later, and the initial Buffy/Giles scene in the Library was reshot to tone down Buffy's anger.

The Dollhouse "The Most Dangerous Game" reference was announced with the "Richard Connell" alias adopted by the client. Richard Connell was the author of the short story. So it was a purposeful choice. "Richard' appears to have been an Active created by Alpha.

The Alpha character suggests that Whedon is picking up elements from both The Initiative and the Blue Hands group. He is certainly hitting on themes that have engaged him in the past.

Anonymous Bosch said...

'The Most Dangerous Game' is where writers go when they're truly out of ideas. I can't count how many times I've seen the mouldy old plot dragged out, yet again, for another retelling, ignoring the fact it wasn't that interesting in the first place.

I think it appeals to writers because it's long out of copyright, and it can be done very cheaply with a few bushes and fake weapons.

Not very reassuring for Episode 2so I'm bailing on it. If it miraculously gets good and doesn't get cancelled, i'll rent out the DVD set a year from now.

Anyone seen 'The Pest'?

berg said...

Joss Whedon is neither a feminist nor does he fancy writing strong women. He FANTASIZES about strong women. Which I guess makes him... a dude.

As for episode two of Dollhouse? Second verse, same as the first.

Did you see that interview with Dushku where she said Dollhouse "gets good" around episode six. Okay, doll. Enough talking. Back in the box you go.

Michael Taylor said...

The very first episode of "West Wing" was the best pilot I've ever seen, and one of the best hours of television I've had the pleasure to watch. I'm not a screewriter, but anyone who is or wants to be could learn a lot from that episode.

Re: the excitable Mr. Bale -- I agree that McG completely blew it in allowing Bale to go far beyond ballistic on the set of T-4, but Christian Bale's childishly self-indulgent display of extreme petulance was as far from professional behavior as you possibly can get. Having worked on sets for over thirty years now -- features, TV, commercials, and music videos -- I've witnessed a number of talent melt-downs, but nothing close to Bale's shamefully narcissistic tantrum. Yes, Shane Hurlbut violated the eye-line more than once, but a truly professional actor would never have gone apeshit for four long minutes. A fifteen second tongue-lashing/bitch-slap should have done the trick.

I think it's a good thing that clip was leaked, forcing Bale to apologize. The man badly needed to learn a little humility, and that there are limits to acceptable behavior in any workplace -- even for a big-time movie star on the cloistered confines of a set. Allowing such reprehensible behavior to go unchecked would only lead to an even bigger ego-explosion next time.

As for anger counseling -- if Bale was smart, he'd take that anger management course on his own dime. But that won't happen until pigs fly over the frozen wastelands of Hell.

Little Miss Nomad said...

Wait, who says it's fashionable to hate West Wing? Everyone I know who saw it loved it and still loves it. There was a season or so in there when it wasn't so hot, but overall, one of the most beloved shows I know.

pomme said...

i was a fan of Buffy because she's a strong girl not a pretty stupid girl! and i believe Whedon loves strong woman!you're right,joss!
on Bale rant,all i say it's not the first or last losing his temper on set! and a little story on a rant in a set.Several years ago,i was on the set "a good year"by Ridley Scott in France as a visitor! My phone rang during a shooting of a scene! Scott screamed on me during 5 minutes and he fired me of the set! No one stopped him!after,no one exterior of the tech team wasn't able to be on the set!