Now that Lost has ended, there are a bazillion blog posts on how unfulfilling, stupid, disjointed, illogical and pointless it was. Many bloggers ask many questions about the point of it all, and then complain that none of the questions was answered. As one of the viewers who didn't chart the plot points of this bitch, I gotta say... is that REALLY what you want? Or is it possible to just, I dunno... WATCH the show and follow the characters and enjoy the tremendous symmetry of the finale? I always weary of logic nerds who seem incapable of understanding character and emotion and exist only to complain about red matter and disappearing islands. Because all of the plot detritus aside, what the Lost finale did for me was create a resonant send-off for these characters. But too many people seemed too focused on WHY the flash-sideways universe existed than on what purpose it served.
Giving the flash-sideways universe time to unspool was rewarding, unless you were desperately trying to figure out where to add it on your Lost flow-chart. I found it interesting that all people wanted to do was solve it. They wanted Answers, Goddammit, and screw what was happening with the characters. But everything does NOT need to be spelled out and wrapped up in a neat little bow. That's not what I'm looking for in drama. I like the things that rarely happen in life, like parallels and symmetry and the impossibility of people finding each other. I didn't need to know the express purpose of the hatch (although it's not too hard to figure out now). The hatch introduced me to Desmond, who became one of the show's most captivating, lovelorn characters. But people reject that character development because The Hatch Was STUPID.
Lost was a genre show and as such, that means that every little plot point needs to make perfect mathematical sense. This is also what people objected to with JJ Abrams's Star Trek. It's STAR TREK. It should make logical sense. But what I like about Abrams' ouevre is that he utterly, completely refuses to sacrifice character for logic. Sure, it can get messy and confusing but the Lost finale was SO resonant that all you can do is sit there and marvel at how beautifully these characters were created and developed. You don't get that resonance without all that work, and sure, without some missteps along the way.
For me, the missteps on Lost came in the middle part of the series, when the writers paid too much attention to the Internet and tried to answer questions at the expense of character. And when the writers finally went "Fuck it," the show relaxed back into what made it so fantastic: A character show. Asking for a television show to be perfect for six years is asking the impossible. Every show is going to make mistakes. And a show like Lost, that's so dependent on exploration, takes more of a risk. Look at where this show began, and where it went. People who are so used to being locked in to a premise that carries throughout the life of a show just got mad. They couldn't go with it because that's not what they wanted out of their TeeVee shows. And that's fine. But that doesn't mean Lost was a failure.
What's so wonderful to me about the finale is how it took the crazy six years of this series, with smoke monsters and hatches and psychics and Others, and brought it right back to where it began -- the characters.
Some people said Lost has changed television. But unfortunately, it hasn't. Now it's just... gone. If Lost really WERE the game-changer everybody seems to imagine it to be, then there would be more chances taken in network TeeVee. But networks aren't taking any chances right now. They're circling the economic wagons. I'm not even sure television shows CAN be game-changers anymore. We're too locked into the procedural way of life. ABC took a chance with Lost. The show was bold, rich and different. And it kept being different, to such an extent that people wanted to crush it with a rock. It's funny, because people will go on about how TeeVee is just the same-old all the time but then they'll turn around and criticize the Jacob/Man In Black origin episode by going, "Gee, there are only a few episodes left and THAT'S what they want to spend their time on?" Well, YEAH. THAT'S WHAT MAKES THE SHOW DIFFERENT. You, guys, are trying to shove it back into that safe format that networks have been forcing upon you for decades. You're not ready for different either, audience.
Getting into fights on the Internet about creator intent is SO mid-90s. If you didn't like the finale, fine. We're just looking for different things from our drama.
So maybe you're wondering WTF happened. Were they dead? Alive and then dead? Not waving, drowning? Here's my interpretation, which also happens to be pretty much what Christian Shephard said in that monologue in the church. Seriously. Go back and watch it: Think about the castaways' lives prior to going to the island. As Jacob said, they were all pretty fucked up. They all had problems. They create their universes where their lives are better. Their problems are fixed. And they could exist there forever, if they wanted to (the choice Ben made at the end). But instead, they choose to remember their fucked-up existences. They can't be together in their perfect lives, so they sacrifice those lives, those fantasies, because moving on together is preferable the superficial fantasy of a life that hasn't really been lived.
And the ending mirroring the opening shot of the series? How often does a show actually get to pick their ending? It was a beautiful, perfect bookend.
Bravo, Lost. You went out on your own terms.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

9 comments:
You are so right. And the weird thing is, I was one of those saying WTF on Sunday night. I 'kinda' got it, but I was too shocked by the lack of 'island' resolution to get past my desire to see good triumph over evil (even though it actually did -- I was expecting an explanation).
Fortunately I had DVR'd it and went back for a second viewing -- which is something I wish EVERYBODY could do; it made ALL the difference in the world for me.
That being said, I GOT IT the second time, and it absolutely bowled me over. The minute details, like Jack dying in the same spot he started out the series in, Christian's bloody sneaker hanging off a stalk as Jack staggered through the bamboo field, even the significance of Vincent the dog were all 'lost' on me the first time through because I missed the first three seasons of the series. These were things I learned about only in reading blog posts and other wrap-ups. And fortunately, every one I read was positive.
Despite the fact I only watched LOST from 2007 on, I fell hard for this show. I wasn't acquainted with some of the early-departed characters that were brought back for the finale, but I understood them in the context of The End. But I LOVED the main characters and cannot imagine a more brilliant resolution to this incredible series.
Like you said, Kay, I don't even care about the island anymore. It doesn't bother me that all my questions weren't answered. Because the second viewing of the finale was the most powerful TeeVee moment of my lifetime.
You said it very well, Kay. And you really hit the nail on the head with the middle part of the series. It mirrored my feelings exactly. When I stopped trying to figure things out and listening to all the conspiracy theories, I enjoyed the show far more. Character is always prime for me over plot and ensemble casts (West Wing, Friends, ER, Lost, Alias) are the shows I always like the best. I found it very satisfying that they could leave so many quesions unanswered while still giving closure to the characters and their relationships. Life is full of questions (and don't even get me started on the afterlife!) and there are things we will never be able to understand in life (like polar bears on tropical islands *g*). Lost did a great job.
I’m getting a little tired of the “it was never about the island but about the characters” argument. Here’s the deal: Lost was never a character show with some mystery element, but a mystery show with great characters. That’s why people discussed the origin of the smoke monster or the polar bears, not whether Jack should be with Juliet or Kate... They had two seasons to wrap things up and still give us all the great character stuff we saw. But they decided to ignore all the little -and some bigger- mysteries and give us a hokey "peachy purgatory" that nobody asked for - not even the characters. Talking of which - what's the excuse for Sayid's wife, you know the one he tortured, lost, then found, and later married before she was murdered, being replaced by some blond bimbo as his one true soulmate? I forgot - television isn't perfect and the audience should just shut up or turn off. God forbid an engaged audience that actually follows a show (gasp!) and picks up on all the inconsistencies (plot and character related). They are flow-chart carrying nerds who should get a life right? They also happen to be the same nerds that made the show such a success. Is why they marketed Lost at comic-con last year. They knew their core audience and they dropped the ball on them. Obviously they never had the answers. And coming up with them would've required to re-watch 120 hours of Lost and who wants to do that? So fuck it. It was never about the science but about faith right? No, it’s a cop out. And shows that black horn-rimmed glasses or not, the writers of Lost aren’t nearly as smart as we wanted them to be.
I don't know. I don't think it's too much have asked for the writers to have offered both the character development AND some consistency AND a few answers.
The way they revealed things, it was difficult to trust anything Jacob said or did.
Excusing lazy writing as "character driven" does not a great show make. It's fine NOT to answer everything - McGoohan's THE PRISONER is a great example. But at least THE PRISONER was touted as an allegory, and at least there was some consistency in its universe.
LOST, from the very beginning, moved its plot along by having all the characters act like scared cockroaches to everything... great in terms of drama, but running on just momentum was pretty tedious - if there were an episode where maybe several of the characters actually had a conversation around the campfire and sort of reasoned things out, then the show would have blown through its main plot points by the end of the seconde season.
It's not out of line, for people who have invested a good deal of time, and who have made the producers rich, to at least demand some consistency... LOST just threw in anything and everything to keep the action moving, and basically, gave the audience the Big Finger at the end with the JACOB'S LADDER ending, and throwing the elements what drove the show under the bus.
"Different" is not the same as "Great".... Different and Great, hell, Different and GOOD, is what most readers of your blog would like to see achieved. But shows such as LOST, which pretty much dicked the audience... another Abrams Enclave trait, I notice...those oncoming batch of LOST imitators will find it a lot harder to make it - especially if the staff is as lazy and cynical as LOST turned out to be.
Here's the thing...
It started with “where the hell are we?” and ended with them hugging in a church. “Guys - where are we?”, as muttered by Charlie at the end of the Pilot, was the show’s central question. And it was never answered! Instead they created a sideways-flashforward-what-the-fuck-world. Then Christian Shephard shepherds them from the Christian church into the light. That’s not faith – that’s religion.
I like the idea of a peachy purgatory where one deals with issues you couldn’t deal with in your earthly existence before you move on. It doesn’t make a lick of sense who is there and who’s not but that’s the kind of logic I am willing to suspend. Who knows, maybe if we had watched an entire episode on Sayid’s wife we would’ve found out she wasn’t the love of his life but only suffered from Stockholm syndrome. In the same spirit I don’t need every tidbit of mystery explained to me (Walt communicating via computer with his dad – what was that all about?). But to ignore the central question is what left so many viewers hanging.
Trust me, had they revealed a UFO at the bowels of the light cave that crashed in ancient Atlantis and caused it to sink into the ocean leaving only the remnants or what we now know as the island... people would be arguing about how stupid or awesome that is – but at least they’d be arguing about an answer, not about the lack thereof.
I loved it. And I think Kay's point about the show's critics wanting to crush it with a rock for being different was dead on. The show moved me and answered just enough questions for me. I still have things to contemplate now that it's over. I don't know that another show has ever given this to me in the way this show has.
I would have liked to know a little more about the Island's origins, but I can live with that.
For me, it's about the heartbreak of Jack's death, the thought of Kate's grief, and the wondering about what became of Sawyer in the rest of his life that left me feeling so moved at the end of the show. Not to mention Hurley!
Think about it. When has there ever been a show that created so many compelling characters and sustained them for so long?
It's an incredible achievement, in my eyes.
Notice how none of the disgruntled viewers have a problem with the character arcs... shit, we all love us some Sawyer, Hurley and Kate. But great characters doesn't mean you can't have story logic, should dismiss your own setups, and forgo answering the most basic questions. And let’s face it, it’s not like Lost had no character issues. The lazy disposal of Widmore getting shot in a closet was just as disappointing as Walt being set up as such a “special” character only to be send off the island in a cockleshell.
I have a feeling that Kay, working in television, has some greater insight into how hard it is to pull off all the good stuff in a network environment, and hence a greater appreciation for it. Nobody is saying Lost is a failure. You have to be passionate about a show to be disappointed by it - and to discuss it in detail. What gets me is the notion that the audience should be happy with what they got. The writers knew what the viewers wanted and had two seasons to deliver the goods. And to many, they didn’t.
Truth is, the real reason why the big question about what the island really is wasn’t answered might well be that the makers of Lost need a hook for the movie LOST - THE HURLEY YEARS... Ka-ching!
Great post. To answer every question, tie up every island mystery in a neat pink bow, and fully satisfy every dedicated internet-dwelling "Lost" fan would have taken another season or two --and love it or hate it, this show had reached its sell-by date. As one who came aboard in Season Two, I liked "Lost" enough to keep watching all the way through. Still, it was time to end this show, and if a boatload of questions will forever remain mysteries, the ending worked in all the ways that mattered most to me.
Now it's over, and I'm fine with that.
Post a Comment